Kontent qismiga oʻtish

Foydalanuvchi:Anjaniy/qumloq

Vikipediya, erkin ensiklopediya

Modelling

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Energy flows between space, the atmosphere, and Earth’s surface. Most sunlight passes through the atmosphere to heat the Earth’s surface, then greenhouse gases absorb most of the heat the Earth radiates in response. Adding to greenhouse gases increases this insulating effect, causing an energy imbalance that heats the planet up.

A climate model is a representation of the physical, chemical and biological processes that affect the climate system.[1] Models include natural processes like changes in the Earth’s orbit, historical changes in the Sunʼs activity, and volcanic forcing.[2] Models are used to estimate the degree of warming future emissions will cause when accounting for the strength of climate feedbacks.[3][4] Models also predict the circulation of the oceans, the annual cycle of the seasons, and the flows of carbon between the land surface and the atmosphere.[5]

The physical realism of models is tested by examining their ability to simulate current or past climates.[6] Past models have underestimated the rate of Arctic shrinkage[7] and underestimated the rate of precipitation increase.[8] Sea level rise since 1990 was underestimated in older models, but more recent models agree well with observations.[9] The 2017 United States-published National Climate Assessment notes that „climate models may still be underestimating or missing relevant feedback processes“.[10] Additionally, climate models may be unable to adequately predict short-term regional climatic shifts.[11]

A subset of climate models add societal factors to a physical climate model. These models simulate how population, economic growth, and energy use affect—and interact with—the physical climate. With this information, these models can produce scenarios of future greenhouse gas emissions. This is then used as input for physical climate models and carbon cycle models to predict how atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases might change.[12][13] Depending on the socioeconomic scenario and the mitigation scenario, models produce atmospheric Andoza:CO2 concentrations that range widely between 380 and 1400 ppm.[14]

Impacts

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Asosiy sahifa: Effects of climate change
The sixth IPCC Assessment Report projects changes in average soil moisture at 2.0 °C of warming, as measured in standard deviations from the 1850 to 1900 baseline.

Environmental effects

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]

The environmental effects of climate change are broad and far-reaching, affecting oceans, ice, and weather. Changes may occur gradually or rapidly. Evidence for these effects comes from studying climate change in the past, from modelling, and from modern observations.[15] Since the 1950s, droughts and heat waves have appeared simultaneously with increasing frequency.[16] Extremely wet or dry events within the monsoon period have increased in India and East Asia.[17] Monsoonal precipitation over the Northern Hemisphere has increased since 1980.[18] The rainfall rate and intensity of hurricanes and typhoons is likely increasing,[19] and the geographic range likely expanding poleward in response to climate warming.[20] Frequency of tropical cyclones has not increased as a result of climate change.[21]

Historical sea level reconstruction and projections up to 2100 published in 2017 by the U. S. Global Change Research Program[22]

Global sea level is rising as a consequence of thermal expansion and the melting of glaciers and ice sheets. Sea level rise has increased over time, reaching 4.8 cm per decade between 2014 and 2023.[23] Over the 21st century, the IPCC projects 32–62 cm of sea level rise under a low emission scenario, 44–76 cm under an intermediate one and 65–101 cm under a very high emission scenario.[24] Marine ice sheet instability processes in Antarctica may add substantially to these values,[25] including the possibility of a 2-meter sea level rise by 2100 under high emissions.[26]

Climate change has led to decades of shrinking and thinning of the Arctic sea ice.[27] While ice-free summers are expected to be rare at 1.5 °C degrees of warming, they are set to occur once every three to ten years at a warming level of 2 °C.[28] Higher atmospheric Andoza:CO2 concentrations cause more Andoza:CO2 to dissolve in the oceans, which is making them more acidic.[29] Because oxygen is less soluble in warmer water,[30] its concentrations in the ocean are decreasing, and dead zones are expanding.[31]

Tipping points and long-term impacts

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Different levels of global warming may cause different parts of Earth’s climate system to reach tipping points that cause transitions to different states.[32][33]
Asosiy sahifa: Tipping points in the climate system

Greater degrees of global warming increase the risk of passing through 'tipping points'—thresholds beyond which certain major impacts can no longer be avoided even if temperatures return to their previous state.[34][35] For instance, the Greenland ice sheet is already melting, but if global warming reaches levels between 1.7 °C and 2.3 °C, its melting will continue until it fully disappears. If the warming is later reduced to 1.5 °C or less, it will still lose a lot more ice than if the warming was never allowed to reach the threshold in the first place.[36] While the ice sheets would melt over millennia, other tipping points would occur faster and give societies less time to respond. The collapse of major ocean currents like the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), and irreversible damage to key ecosystems like the Amazon rainforest and coral reefs can unfold in a matter of decades.[33]

The long-term effects of climate change on oceans include further ice melt, ocean warming, sea level rise, ocean acidification and ocean deoxygenation.[37] The timescale of long-term impacts are centuries to millennia due to Andoza:CO2's long atmospheric lifetime.[38] The result is an estimated total sea level rise of 2.3 metr / degree Celsius (4.2 ft/°F) after 2000 years.[39] Oceanic Andoza:CO2 uptake is slow enough that ocean acidification will also continue for hundreds to thousands of years.[40] Deep oceans (below 2,000 metr (6,600 ft)) are also already committed to losing over 10% of their dissolved oxygen by the warming which occurred to date.[41] Further, the West Antarctic ice sheet appears committed to practically irreversible melting, which would increase the sea levels by at least 3.3 m (10 ft 10 in) over approximately 2000 years.[33][42][43]

Nature and wildlife

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]

Recent warming has driven many terrestrial and freshwater species poleward and towards higher altitudes.[44] For instance, the range of hundreds of North American birds has shifted northward at an average rate of 1.5 km/year over the past 55 years.[45] Higher atmospheric Andoza:CO2 levels and an extended growing season have resulted in global greening. However, heatwaves and drought have reduced ecosystem productivity in some regions. The future balance of these opposing effects is unclear.[46] A related phenomenon driven by climate change is woody plant encroachment, affecting up to 500 million hectares globally.[47] Climate change has contributed to the expansion of drier climate zones, such as the expansion of deserts in the subtropics.[48] The size and speed of global warming is making abrupt changes in ecosystems more likely.[49] Overall, it is expected that climate change will result in the extinction of many species.[50]

The oceans have heated more slowly than the land, but plants and animals in the ocean have migrated towards the colder poles faster than species on land.[51] Just as on land, heat waves in the ocean occur more frequently due to climate change, harming a wide range of organisms such as corals, kelp, and seabirds.[52] Ocean acidification makes it harder for marine calcifying organisms such as mussels, barnacles and corals to produce shells and skeletons; and heatwaves have bleached coral reefs.[53] Harmful algal blooms enhanced by climate change and eutrophication lower oxygen levels, disrupt food webs and cause great loss of marine life.[54] Coastal ecosystems are under particular stress. Almost half of global wetlands have disappeared due to climate change and other human impacts.[55] Plants have come under increased stress from damage by insects.[56]

Climate change impacts on the environment

Humans

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Asosiy sahifa: Effects of climate change
Extreme weather will be progressively more common as the Earth warms.[62]

The effects of climate change are impacting humans everywhere in the world.[63] Impacts can be observed on all continents and ocean regions,[64] with low-latitude, less developed areas facing the greatest risk.[65] Continued warming has potentially „severe, pervasive and irreversible impacts“ for people and ecosystems.[66] The risks are unevenly distributed, but are generally greater for disadvantaged people in developing and developed countries.[67]

Health and food

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Asosiy sahifa: Effects of climate change on agriculture#Global food security and undernutrition va Effects of climate change on human health

The World Health Organization calls climate change one of the biggest threats to global health in the 21st century.[68] Scientists have warned about the irreversible harms it poses.[69] Extreme weather events affect public health, and food and water security.[70][71][72] Temperature extremes lead to increased illness and death.[70][71] Climate change increases the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events.[71][72] It can affect transmission of infectious diseases, such as dengue fever and malaria.[69][70] According to the World Economic Forum, 14.5 million more deaths are expected due to climate change by 2050.[73] 30% of the global population currently live in areas where extreme heat and humidity are already associated with excess deaths.[74][75] By 2100, 50% to 75% of the global population would live in such areas.[74][76]

While total crop yields have been increasing in the past 50 years due to agricultural improvements, climate change has already decreased the rate of yield growth.[72] Fisheries have been negatively affected in multiple regions.[72] While agricultural productivity has been positively affected in some high latitude areas, mid- and low-latitude areas have been negatively affected.[72] According to the World Economic Forum, an increase in drought in certain regions could cause 3.2 million deaths from malnutrition by 2050 and stunting in children.[77] With 2 °C warming, global livestock headcounts could decline by 7–10% by 2050, as less animal feed will be available.[78] If the emissions continue to increase for the rest of century, then over 9 million climate-related deaths would occur annually by 2100.[79]

Livelihoods and inequality

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]

Economic damages due to climate change may be severe and there is a chance of disastrous consequences.[80] Severe impacts are expected in South-East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, where most of the local inhabitants are dependent upon natural and agricultural resources.[81][82] Heat stress can prevent outdoor labourers from working. If warming reaches 4 °C then labour capacity in those regions could be reduced by 30 to 50%.[83] The World Bank estimates that between 2016 and 2030, climate change could drive over 120 million people into extreme poverty without adaptation.[84]

Inequalities based on wealth and social status have worsened due to climate change.[85] Major difficulties in mitigating, adapting to, and recovering from climate shocks are faced by marginalized people who have less control over resources.[86][81] Indigenous people, who are subsistent on their land and ecosystems, will face endangerment to their wellness and lifestyles due to climate change.[87] An expert elicitation concluded that the role of climate change in armed conflict has been small compared to factors such as socio-economic inequality and state capabilities.[88]

While women are not inherently more at risk from climate change and shocks, limits on womenʼs resources and discriminatory gender norms constrain their adaptive capacity and resilience.[89] For example, womenʼs work burdens, including hours worked in agriculture, tend to decline less than menʼs during climate shocks such as heat stress.[89]

Climate migration

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Asosiy sahifa: Climate migration

Low-lying islands and coastal communities are threatened by sea level rise, which makes urban flooding more common. Sometimes, land is permanently lost to the sea.[90] This could lead to statelessness for people in island nations, such as the Maldives and Tuvalu.[91] In some regions, the rise in temperature and humidity may be too severe for humans to adapt to.[92] With worst-case climate change, models project that almost one-third of humanity might live in Sahara-like uninhabitable and extremely hot climates.[93]

These factors can drive climate or environmental migration, within and between countries.[94] More people are expected to be displaced because of sea level rise, extreme weather and conflict from increased competition over natural resources. Climate change may also increase vulnerability, leading to „trapped populations“ who are not able to move due to a lack of resources.[95]

Climate change impacts on people

Reducing and recapturing emissions

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Asosiy sahifa: Climate change mitigation
Global greenhouse gas emission scenarios, based on policies and pledges as of November 2021

Climate change can be mitigated by reducing the rate at which greenhouse gases are emitted into the atmosphere, and by increasing the rate at which carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere.[101] To limit global warming to less than 1.5 °C global greenhouse gas emissions needs to be net-zero by 2050, or by 2070 with a 2 °C target.[102] This requires far-reaching, systemic changes on an unprecedented scale in energy, land, cities, transport, buildings, and industry.[103]

The United Nations Environment Programme estimates that countries need to triple their pledges under the Paris Agreement within the next decade to limit global warming to 2 °C. An even greater level of reduction is required to meet the 1.5 °C goal.[104] With pledges made under the Paris Agreement as of 2024, there would be a 66% chance that global warming is kept under 2.8 °C by the end of the century (range: 1.9–3.7 °C, depending on exact implementation and technological progress). When only considering current policies, this raises to 3.1 °C.[105] Globally, limiting warming to 2 °C may result in higher economic benefits than economic costs.[106]

Although there is no single pathway to limit global warming to 1.5 or 2 °C,[107] most scenarios and strategies see a major increase in the use of renewable energy in combination with increased energy efficiency measures to generate the needed greenhouse gas reductions.[108] To reduce pressures on ecosystems and enhance their carbon sequestration capabilities, changes would also be necessary in agriculture and forestry,[109] such as preventing deforestation and restoring natural ecosystems by reforestation.[110]

Other approaches to mitigating climate change have a higher level of risk. Scenarios that limit global warming to 1.5 °C typically project the large-scale use of carbon dioxide removal methods over the 21st century.[111] There are concerns, though, about over-reliance on these technologies, and environmental impacts.[112] Solar radiation modification (SRM) is also a possible supplement to deep reductions in emissions. However, SRM raises significant ethical and legal concerns, and the risks are imperfectly understood.[113]

Clean energy

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Asosiy sahifa: Sustainable energy va Sustainable transport
Coal, oil, and natural gas remain the primary global energy sources even as renewables have begun rapidly increasing.[114]
Wind and solar power, Germany

Renewable energy is key to limiting climate change.[115] For decades, fossil fuels have accounted for roughly 80% of the world’s energy use.[116] The remaining share has been split between nuclear power and renewables (including hydropower, bioenergy, wind and solar power and geothermal energy).[117] Fossil fuel use is expected to peak in absolute terms prior to 2030 and then to decline, with coal use experiencing the sharpest reductions.[118] Renewables represented 86% of all new electricity generation installed in 2023.[119] Other forms of clean energy, such as nuclear and hydropower, currently have a larger share of the energy supply. However, their future growth forecasts appear limited in comparison.[120]

While solar panels and onshore wind are now among the cheapest forms of adding new power generation capacity in many locations,[121] green energy policies are needed to achieve a rapid transition from fossil fuels to renewables.[122] To achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, renewable energy would become the dominant form of electricity generation, rising to 85% or more by 2050 in some scenarios. Investment in coal would be eliminated and coal use nearly phased out by 2050.[123][124]

Electricity generated from renewable sources would also need to become the main energy source for heating and transport.[125] Transport can switch away from internal combustion engine vehicles and towards electric vehicles, public transit, and active transport (cycling and walking).[126][127] For shipping and flying, low-carbon fuels would reduce emissions.[126] Heating could be increasingly decarbonized with technologies like heat pumps.[128]

There are obstacles to the continued rapid growth of clean energy, including renewables.[129] Wind and solar produce energy intermittently and with seasonal variability. Traditionally, hydro dams with reservoirs and fossil fuel power plants have been used when variable energy production is low. Going forward, battery storage can be expanded, energy demand and supply can be matched, and long-distance transmission can smooth variability of renewable outputs.[115] Bioenergy is often not carbon-neutral and may have negative consequences for food security.[130] The growth of nuclear power is constrained by controversy around radioactive waste, nuclear weapon proliferation, and accidents.[131][132] Hydropower growth is limited by the fact that the best sites have been developed, and new projects are confronting increased social and environmental concerns.[133]

Low-carbon energy improves human health by minimizing climate change as well as reducing air pollution deaths,[134] which were estimated at 7 million annually in 2016.[135] Meeting the Paris Agreement goals that limit warming to a 2 °C increase could save about a million of those lives per year by 2050, whereas limiting global warming to 1.5 °C could save millions and simultaneously increase energy security and reduce poverty.[136] Improving air quality also has economic benefits which may be larger than mitigation costs.[137]

Energy conservation

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Asosiy sahifa: Efficient energy use va Energy conservation

Reducing energy demand is another major aspect of reducing emissions.[138] If less energy is needed, there is more flexibility for clean energy development. It also makes it easier to manage the electricity grid, and minimizes carbon-intensive infrastructure development.[139] Major increases in energy efficiency investment will be required to achieve climate goals, comparable to the level of investment in renewable energy.[140] Several COVID-19 related changes in energy use patterns, energy efficiency investments, and funding have made forecasts for this decade more difficult and uncertain.[141]

Strategies to reduce energy demand vary by sector. In the transport sector, passengers and freight can switch to more efficient travel modes, such as buses and trains, or use electric vehicles.[142] Industrial strategies to reduce energy demand include improving heating systems and motors, designing less energy-intensive products, and increasing product lifetimes.[143] In the building sector the focus is on better design of new buildings, and higher levels of energy efficiency in retrofitting.[144] The use of technologies like heat pumps can also increase building energy efficiency.[145]

Agriculture and industry

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Yana qarang: Sustainable agriculture va Green industrial policy
Taking into account direct and indirect emissions, industry is the sector with the highest share of global emissions. Data as of 2019 from the IPCC.

Agriculture and forestry face a triple challenge of limiting greenhouse gas emissions, preventing the further conversion of forests to agricultural land, and meeting increases in world food demand.[146] A set of actions could reduce agriculture and forestry-based emissions by two-thirds from 2010 levels. These include reducing growth in demand for food and other agricultural products, increasing land productivity, protecting and restoring forests, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production.[147]

On the demand side, a key component of reducing emissions is shifting people towards plant-based diets.[148] Eliminating the production of livestock for meat and dairy would eliminate about 3/4ths of all emissions from agriculture and other land use.[149] Livestock also occupy 37% of ice-free land area on Earth and consume feed from the 12% of land area used for crops, driving deforestation and land degradation.[150]

Steel and cement production are responsible for about 13% of industrial Andoza:CO2 emissions. In these industries, carbon-intensive materials such as coke and lime play an integral role in the production, so that reducing Andoza:CO2 emissions requires research into alternative chemistries.[151] Where energy production or Andoza:CO2-intensive heavy industries continue to produce waste Andoza:CO2, technology can sometimes be used to capture and store most of the gas instead of releasing it to the atmosphere.[152] This technology, carbon capture and storage (CCS), could have a critical but limited role in reducing emissions.[152] It is relatively expensive[153] and has been deployed only to an extent that removes around 0.1% of annual greenhouse gas emissions.[152]

Carbon dioxide removal

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Asosiy sahifa: Carbon dioxide removal va Carbon sequestration
Most Andoza:CO2 emissions have been absorbed by carbon sinks, including plant growth, soil uptake, and ocean uptake (2020 Global Carbon Budget).

Natural carbon sinks can be enhanced to sequester significantly larger amounts of Andoza:CO2 beyond naturally occurring levels.[154] Reforestation and afforestation (planting forests where there were none before) are among the most mature sequestration techniques, although the latter raises food security concerns.[155] Farmers can promote sequestration of carbon in soils through practices such as use of winter cover crops, reducing the intensity and frequency of tillage, and using compost and manure as soil amendments.[156] Forest and landscape restoration yields many benefits for the climate, including greenhouse gas emissions sequestration and reduction.[157] Restoration/recreation of coastal wetlands, prairie plots and seagrass meadows increases the uptake of carbon into organic matter.[158][159] When carbon is sequestered in soils and in organic matter such as trees, there is a risk of the carbon being re-released into the atmosphere later through changes in land use, fire, or other changes in ecosystems.[160]

The use of bioenergy in conjunction with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) can result in net negative emissions as Andoza:CO2 is drawn from the atmosphere.[161] It remains highly uncertain whether carbon dioxide removal techniques will be able to play a large role in limiting warming to 1.5 °C. Policy decisions that rely on carbon dioxide removal increase the risk of global warming rising beyond international goals.[162]

Adaptation

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Asosiy sahifa: Climate change adaptation

Adaptation is „the process of adjustment to current or expected changes in climate and its effects“.[163]:5 Without additional mitigation, adaptation cannot avert the risk of „severe, widespread and irreversible“ impacts.[164] More severe climate change requires more transformative adaptation, which can be prohibitively expensive.[165] The capacity and potential for humans to adapt is unevenly distributed across different regions and populations, and developing countries generally have less.[166] The first two decades of the 21st century saw an increase in adaptive capacity in most low- and middle-income countries with improved access to basic sanitation and electricity, but progress is slow. Many countries have implemented adaptation policies. However, there is a considerable gap between necessary and available finance.[167]

Adaptation to sea level rise consists of avoiding at-risk areas, learning to live with increased flooding, and building flood controls. If that fails, managed retreat may be needed.[168] There are economic barriers for tackling dangerous heat impact. Avoiding strenuous work or having air conditioning is not possible for everybody.[169] In agriculture, adaptation options include a switch to more sustainable diets, diversification, erosion control, and genetic improvements for increased tolerance to a changing climate.[170] Insurance allows for risk-sharing, but is often difficult to get for people on lower incomes.[171] Education, migration and early warning systems can reduce climate vulnerability.[172] Planting mangroves or encouraging other coastal vegetation can buffer storms.[173][174]

Ecosystems adapt to climate change, a process that can be supported by human intervention. By increasing connectivity between ecosystems, species can migrate to more favourable climate conditions. Species can also be introduced to areas acquiring a favourable climate. Protection and restoration of natural and semi-natural areas helps build resilience, making it easier for ecosystems to adapt. Many of the actions that promote adaptation in ecosystems, also help humans adapt via ecosystem-based adaptation. For instance, restoration of natural fire regimes makes catastrophic fires less likely, and reduces human exposure. Giving rivers more space allows for more water storage in the natural system, reducing flood risk. Restored forest acts as a carbon sink, but planting trees in unsuitable regions can exacerbate climate impacts.[175]

There are synergies but also trade-offs between adaptation and mitigation.[176] An example for synergy is increased food productivity, which has large benefits for both adaptation and mitigation.[177] An example of a trade-off is that increased use of air conditioning allows people to better cope with heat, but increases energy demand. Another trade-off example is that more compact urban development may reduce emissions from transport and construction, but may also increase the urban heat island effect, exposing people to heat-related health risks.[178]

Examples of adaptation methods

Policies and politics

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Yana qarang: Politics of climate change va Climate change mitigation#Policies
The Climate Change Performance Index ranks countries by greenhouse gas emissions (40% of score), renewable energy (20%), energy use (20%), and climate policy (20%).
  High
  Medium
  Low
  Very low

Countries that are most vulnerable to climate change have typically been responsible for a small share of global emissions. This raises questions about justice and fairness.[179] Limiting global warming makes it much easier to achieve the UNʼs Sustainable Development Goals, such as eradicating poverty and reducing inequalities. The connection is recognized in Sustainable Development Goal 13 which is to „take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts“.[180] The goals on food, clean water and ecosystem protection have synergies with climate mitigation.[181]

The geopolitics of climate change is complex. It has often been framed as a free-rider problem, in which all countries benefit from mitigation done by other countries, but individual countries would lose from switching to a low-carbon economy themselves. Sometimes mitigation also has localized benefits though. For instance, the benefits of a coal phase-out to public health and local environments exceed the costs in almost all regions.[182] Furthermore, net importers of fossil fuels win economically from switching to clean energy, causing net exporters to face stranded assets: fossil fuels they cannot sell.[183]

Policy options

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]

A wide range of policies, regulations, and laws are being used to reduce emissions. As of 2019, carbon pricing covers about 20% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[184] Carbon can be priced with carbon taxes and emissions trading systems.[185] Direct global fossil fuel subsidies reached $319 billion in 2017, and $5.2 trillion when indirect costs such as air pollution are priced in.[186] Ending these can cause a 28% reduction in global carbon emissions and a 46% reduction in air pollution deaths.[187] Money saved on fossil subsidies could be used to support the transition to clean energy instead.[188] More direct methods to reduce greenhouse gases include vehicle efficiency standards, renewable fuel standards, and air pollution regulations on heavy industry.[189] Several countries require utilities to increase the share of renewables in power production.[190]

Climate justice

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]

Policy designed through the lens of climate justice tries to address human rights issues and social inequality. According to proponents of climate justice, the costs of climate adaptation should be paid by those most responsible for climate change, while the beneficiaries of payments should be those suffering impacts. One way this can be addressed in practice is to have wealthy nations pay poorer countries to adapt.[191]

Oxfam found that in 2023 the wealthiest 10% of people were responsible for 50% of global emissions, while the bottom 50% were responsible for just 8%.[192] Production of emissions is another way to look at responsibility: under that approach, the top 21 fossil fuel companies would owe cumulative climate reparations of $5.4 trillion over the period 2025–2050.[193] To achieve a just transition, people working in the fossil fuel sector would also need other jobs, and their communities would need investments.[194]

International climate agreements

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Since 2000, rising Andoza:CO2 emissions in China and the rest of world have surpassed the output of the United States and Europe.[195]
Per person, the United States generates Andoza:CO2 at a far faster rate than other primary regions.[195]

Nearly all countries in the world are parties to the 1994 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).[196] The goal of the UNFCCC is to prevent dangerous human interference with the climate system.[197] As stated in the convention, this requires that greenhouse gas concentrations are stabilized in the atmosphere at a level where ecosystems can adapt naturally to climate change, food production is not threatened, and economic development can be sustained.[198] The UNFCCC does not itself restrict emissions but rather provides a framework for protocols that do. Global emissions have risen since the UNFCCC was signed.[199] Its yearly conferences are the stage of global negotiations.[200]

The 1997 Kyoto Protocol extended the UNFCCC and included legally binding commitments for most developed countries to limit their emissions.[201] During the negotiations, the G77 (representing developing countries) pushed for a mandate requiring developed countries to „[take] the lead“ in reducing their emissions,[202] since developed countries contributed most to the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Per-capita emissions were also still relatively low in developing countries and developing countries would need to emit more to meet their development needs.[203]

The 2009 Copenhagen Accord has been widely portrayed as disappointing because of its low goals, and was rejected by poorer nations including the G77.[204] Associated parties aimed to limit the global temperature rise to below 2 °C.[205] The Accord set the goal of sending $100 billion per year to developing countries for mitigation and adaptation by 2020, and proposed the founding of the Green Climate Fund.[206] -Missing required parameter 1=''month''!, 2020-yil(2020-Missing required parameter 1=month!-00) holatiga koʻra, only 83.3 billion were delivered. Only in 2023 the target is expected to be achieved.[207]

In 2015 all UN countries negotiated the Paris Agreement, which aims to keep global warming well below 2.0 °C and contains an aspirational goal of keeping warming under 1.5 °C.[208] The agreement replaced the Kyoto Protocol. Unlike Kyoto, no binding emission targets were set in the Paris Agreement. Instead, a set of procedures was made binding. Countries have to regularly set ever more ambitious goals and reevaluate these goals every five years.[209] The Paris Agreement restated that developing countries must be financially supported.[210] -Missing required parameter 1=''month''!, [[Expression error: Unrecognized word "october".-yil]](October 2021-Missing required parameter 1=month!-00) holatiga koʻra, 194 states and the European Union have signed the treaty and 191 states and the EU have ratified or acceded to the agreement.[211]

The 1987 Montreal Protocol, an international agreement to phase out production of ozone-depleting gases, has had benefits for climate change mitigation.[212] Several ozone-depleting gases like chlorofluorocarbons are powerful greenhouse gases, so banning their production and usage may have avoided a temperature rise of 0.5 °C–1.0 °C,[213] as well as additional warming by preventing damage to vegetation from ultraviolet radiation.[214] It is estimated that the agreement has been more effective at curbing greenhouse gas emissions than the Kyoto Protocol specifically designed to do so.[215] The most recent amendment to the Montreal Protocol, the 2016 Kigali Amendment, committed to reducing the emissions of hydrofluorocarbons, which served as a replacement for banned ozone-depleting gases and are also potent greenhouse gases.[216] Should countries comply with the amendment, a warming of 0.3 °C–0.5 °C is estimated to be avoided.[217]

National responses

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]

[[File:Annual-co2-emissions-by-region-2022.png|thumb|260px|Annual [[List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions|Andoza:CO2 emissions by region]]. This measures fossil fuel and industry emissions. Land use change is not included.[218]]] In 2019, the United Kingdom parliament became the first national government to declare a climate emergency.[219] Other countries and jurisdictions followed suit.[220] That same year, the European Parliament declared a „climate and environmental emergency“.[221] The European Commission presented its European Green Deal with the goal of making the EU carbon-neutral by 2050.[222] In 2021, the European Commission released its „Fit for 55“ legislation package, which contains guidelines for the car industry; all new cars on the European market must be zero-emission vehicles from 2035.[223]

Major countries in Asia have made similar pledges: South Korea and Japan have committed to become carbon-neutral by 2050, and China by 2060.[224] While India has strong incentives for renewables, it also plans a significant expansion of coal in the country.[225] Vietnam is among very few coal-dependent, fast-developing countries that pledged to phase out unabated coal power by the 2040s or as soon as possible thereafter.[226]

As of 2021, based on information from 48 national climate plans, which represent 40% of the parties to the Paris Agreement, estimated total greenhouse gas emissions will be 0.5% lower compared to 2010 levels, below the 45% or 25% reduction goals to limit global warming to 1.5 °C or 2 °C, respectively.[227]

Society

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]

Denial and misinformation

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Data has been cherry picked from short periods to falsely assert that global temperatures are not rising. Blue trendlines show short periods that mask longer-term warming trends (red trendlines). Blue rectangle with blue dots shows the so-called global warming hiatus.[228]

Public debate about climate change has been strongly affected by climate change denial and misinformation, which originated in the United States and has since spread to other countries, particularly Canada and Australia. Climate change denial has originated from fossil fuel companies, industry groups, conservative think tanks, and contrarian scientists.[229] Like the tobacco industry, the main strategy of these groups has been to manufacture doubt about climate-change related scientific data and results.[230] People who hold unwarranted doubt about climate change are called climate change „skeptics“, although „contrarians“ or „deniers“ are more appropriate terms.[231]

There are different variants of climate denial: some deny that warming takes place at all, some acknowledge warming but attribute it to natural influences, and some minimize the negative impacts of climate change.[232] Manufacturing uncertainty about the science later developed into a manufactured controversy: creating the belief that there is significant uncertainty about climate change within the scientific community to delay policy changes.[233] Strategies to promote these ideas include criticism of scientific institutions,[234] and questioning the motives of individual scientists.[232] An echo chamber of climate-denying blogs and media has further fomented misunderstanding of climate change.[235]

Public awareness and opinion

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
The public substantially underestimates the degree of scientific consensus that humans are causing climate change.[236] Studies from 2019 to 2021[237][238][239] found scientific consensus to range from 98.7 to 100%.

Climate change came to international public attention in the late 1980s.[240] Due to media coverage in the early 1990s, people often confused climate change with other environmental issues like ozone depletion.[241] In popular culture, the climate fiction movie The Day After Tomorrow (2004) and the Al Gore documentary An Inconvenient Truth (2006) focused on climate change.[240]

Significant regional, gender, age and political differences exist in both public concern for, and understanding of, climate change. More highly educated people, and in some countries, women and younger people, were more likely to see climate change as a serious threat.[242] College biology textbooks from the 2010s featured less content on climate change compared to those from the preceding decade, with decreasing emphasis on solutions.[243] Partisan gaps also exist in many countries,[244] and countries with high CO2 emissions tend to be less concerned.[245] Views on causes of climate change vary widely between countries.[246] Concern has increased over time,[247] and a majority of citizens in many countries now express a high level of worry about climate change, or view it as a global emergency.[248] Higher levels of worry are associated with stronger public support for policies that address climate change.[249]

Climate movement

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Asosiy sahifa: Climate movement va Climate change litigation

Climate protests demand that political leaders take action to prevent climate change. They can take the form of public demonstrations, fossil fuel divestment, lawsuits and other activities.[250] Prominent demonstrations include the School Strike for Climate. In this initiative, young people across the globe have been protesting since 2018 by skipping school on Fridays, inspired by Swedish activist and then-teenager Greta Thunberg.[251] Mass civil disobedience actions by groups like Extinction Rebellion have protested by disrupting roads and public transport.[252]

Litigation is increasingly used as a tool to strengthen climate action from public institutions and companies. Activists also initiate lawsuits which target governments and demand that they take ambitious action or enforce existing laws on climate change.[253] Lawsuits against fossil-fuel companies generally seek compensation for loss and damage.[254]

History

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]

Early discoveries

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
This 1912 article succinctly describes the greenhouse effect, how burning coal creates carbon dioxide to cause global warming and climate change.[255]

Scientists in the 19th century such as Alexander von Humboldt began to foresee the effects of climate change.[256][257][258][259] In the 1820s, Joseph Fourier proposed the greenhouse effect to explain why Earth’s temperature was higher than the Sunʼs energy alone could explain. Earth’s atmosphere is transparent to sunlight, so sunlight reaches the surface where it is converted to heat. However, the atmosphere is not transparent to heat radiating from the surface, and captures some of that heat, which in turn warms the planet.[260]

In 1856 Eunice Newton Foote demonstrated that the warming effect of the Sun is greater for air with water vapour than for dry air, and that the effect is even greater with carbon dioxide (Andoza:Co2). She concluded that „An atmosphere of that gas would give to our earth a high temperature…“[261][262]

Studying what would become known as the greenhouse effect, Tyndall’s pre-1861 ratio spectrophotometer measured how much various gases in a tube absorb and emit infrared radiation—which humans experience as heat.

Starting in 1859,[263] John Tyndall established that nitrogen and oxygen—together totalling 99% of dry air—are transparent to radiated heat. However, water vapour and gases such as methane and carbon dioxide absorb radiated heat and re-radiate that heat into the atmosphere. Tyndall proposed that changes in the concentrations of these gases may have caused climatic changes in the past, including ice ages.[264]

Svante Arrhenius noted that water vapour in air continuously varied, but the Andoza:Co2 concentration in air was influenced by long-term geological processes. Warming from increased Andoza:Co2 levels would increase the amount of water vapour, amplifying warming in a positive feedback loop. In 1896, he published the first climate model of its kind, projecting that halving Andoza:Co2 levels could have produced a drop in temperature initiating an ice age. Arrhenius calculated the temperature increase expected from doubling Andoza:Co2 to be around 5–6 °C.[265] Other scientists were initially sceptical and believed that the greenhouse effect was saturated so that adding more Andoza:Co2 would make no difference, and that the climate would be self-regulating.[266] Beginning in 1938, Guy Stewart Callendar published evidence that climate was warming and Andoza:Co2 levels were rising,[267] but his calculations met the same objections.[266]

Development of a scientific consensus

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
Yana qarang: Scientific consensus on climate change
Scientific consensus on causation: Academic studies of scientific agreement on human-caused global warming among climate experts (2010–2015) reflect that the level of consensus correlates with expertise in climate science.[268] A 2019 study found scientific consensus to be at 100%,[269] and a 2021 study concluded that consensus exceeded 99%.[270] Another 2021 study found that 98.7% of climate experts indicated that the Earth is getting warmer mostly because of human activity.[271]

In the 1950s, Gilbert Plass created a detailed computer model that included different atmospheric layers and the infrared spectrum. This model predicted that increasing Andoza:Co2 levels would cause warming. Around the same time, Hans Suess found evidence that Andoza:Co2 levels had been rising, and Roger Revelle showed that the oceans would not absorb the increase. The two scientists subsequently helped Charles Keeling to begin a record of continued increase, which has been termed the „Keeling Curve“.[266] Scientists alerted the public,[272] and the dangers were highlighted at James Hansenʼs 1988 Congressional testimony.[273] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), set up in 1988 to provide formal advice to the world’s governments, spurred interdisciplinary research.[274] As part of the IPCC reports, scientists assess the scientific discussion that takes place in peer-reviewed journal articles.[275]

There is a near-complete scientific consensus that the climate is warming and that this is caused by human activities. As of 2019, agreement in recent literature reached over 99%.[269][270] No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view.[276] Consensus has further developed that some form of action should be taken to protect people against the impacts of climate change. National science academies have called on world leaders to cut global emissions.[277] The 2021 IPCC Assessment Report stated that it is „unequivocal“ that climate change is caused by humans.[270]

Manbalar

[tahrir | manbasini tahrirlash]
  1. ↑ IPCC AR5 SYR Glossary 2014, s. 120.
  2. ↑ Carbon Brief, 15 January 2018, "What are the different types of climate models?"
  3. ↑ Wolff et al. 2015
  4. ↑ Carbon Brief, 15 January 2018, "Who does climate modelling around the world?"
  5. ↑ Carbon Brief, 15 January 2018, "What is a climate model?"
  6. ↑ IPCC AR4 WG1 Ch8 2007, FAQ 8.1.
  7. ↑ Stroeve et al. 2007; National Geographic, 13 August 2019
  8. ↑ Liepert & Previdi 2009.
  9. ↑ Rahmstorf et al. 2007; Mitchum et al. 2018
  10. ↑ USGCRP Chapter 15 2017.
  11. ↑ Hébert, R.; Herzschuh, U.; Laepple, T. (31 October 2022). "Millennial-scale climate variability over land overprinted by ocean temperature fluctuations". Nature Geoscience 15 (1): 899–905. doi:10.1038/s41561-022-01056-4. PMID 36817575. PMC 7614181. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=7614181. 
  12. ↑ Carbon Brief, 15 January 2018, "What are the inputs and outputs for a climate model?"
  13. ↑ Matthews et al. 2009
  14. ↑ Carbon Brief, 19 April 2018; Meinshausen 2019, s. 462.
  15. ↑ Hansen et al. 2016; Smithsonian, 26 June 2016.
  16. ↑ USGCRP Chapter 15 2017, s. 415.
  17. ↑ Scientific American, 29 April 2014; Burke & Stott 2017.
  18. ↑ Liu, Fei; Wang, Bin; Ouyang, Yu; Wang, Hui; Qiao, Shaobo; Chen, Guosen; Dong, Wenjie (19 April 2022). "Intraseasonal variability of global land monsoon precipitation and its recent trend" (en). npj Climate and Atmospheric Science 5 (1): 30. doi:10.1038/s41612-022-00253-7. ISSN 2397-3722. 
  19. ↑ USGCRP Chapter 9 2017, s. 260.
  20. ↑ Studholme, Joshua; Fedorov, Alexey V.; Gulev, Sergey K.; Emanuel, Kerry; Hodges, Kevin (29 December 2021). "Poleward expansion of tropical cyclone latitudes in warming climates". Nature Geoscience 15: 14–28. doi:10.1038/s41561-021-00859-1. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-021-00859-1. 
  21. ↑ „Hurricanes and Climate Change“. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (2020-yil 10-iyul).
  22. ↑ NOAA 2017.
  23. ↑ WMO 2024a, s. 6.
  24. ↑ IPCC AR6 WG2 2022, s. 1302
  25. ↑ DeConto & Pollard 2016
  26. ↑ Bamber et al. 2019.
  27. ↑ Zhang et al. 2008
  28. ↑ IPCC SROCC Summary for Policymakers 2019, s. 18
  29. ↑ Doney et al. 2009.
  30. ↑ Deutsch et al. 2011
  31. ↑ IPCC SROCC Ch5 2019, s. 510; „Climate Change and Harmful Algal Blooms“. EPA (2013-yil 5-sentyabr). Qaraldi: 2020-yil 11-sentyabr.
  32. ↑ „Tipping Elements – big risks in the Earth System“. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Qaraldi: 2024-yil 31-yanvar.
  33. ↑ 33,0 33,1 33,2 Armstrong McKay, David I.; Staal, Arie; Abrams, Jesse F.; Winkelmann, Ricarda; Sakschewski, Boris; Loriani, Sina; Fetzer, Ingo; Cornell, Sarah E. et al. (9 September 2022). "Exceeding 1.5 °C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points". Science 377 (6611): eabn7950. doi:10.1126/science.abn7950. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 36074831. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abn7950. 
  34. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch3 2018, s. 283.
  35. ↑ Carbon Brief, 10 February 2020
  36. ↑ Bochow, Nils; Poltronieri, Anna; Robinson, Alexander; Montoya, Marisa; Rypdal, Martin; Boers, Niklas (18 October 2023). "Overshooting the critical threshold for the Greenland ice sheet". Nature 622 (7983): 528–536. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06503-9. PMID 37853149. PMC 10584691. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=10584691. 
  37. ↑ IPCC AR6 WG1 Summary for Policymakers 2021, s. 21
  38. ↑ IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch12 2013, ss. 88–89, FAQ 12.3
  39. ↑ Smith et al. 2009; Levermann et al. 2013
  40. ↑ IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch12 2013, s. 1112.
  41. ↑ Oschlies, Andreas (16 April 2021). "A committed fourfold increase in ocean oxygen loss". Nature Communications 12 (1): 2307. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22584-4. PMID 33863893. PMC 8052459. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=8052459. 
  42. ↑ Lau, Sally C. Y.; Wilson, Nerida G.; Golledge, Nicholas R.; Naish, Tim R.; Watts, Phillip C.; Silva, Catarina N. S.; Cooke, Ira R.; Allcock, A. Louise et al. (21 December 2023). "Genomic evidence for West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse during the Last Interglacial". Science 382 (6677): 1384–1389. doi:10.1126/science.ade0664. PMID 38127761. https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/58369/1/science.ade0664%281%29.pdf. 
  43. ↑ Naughten, Kaitlin A.; Holland, Paul R.; De Rydt, Jan (23 October 2023). "Unavoidable future increase in West Antarctic ice-shelf melting over the twenty-first century". Nature Climate Change 13 (11): 1222–1228. doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01818-x. 
  44. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch3 2018, s. 218.
  45. ↑ Martins, Paulo Mateus; Anderson, Marti J.; Sweatman, Winston L.; Punnett, Andrew J. (9 April 2024). "Significant shifts in latitudinal optima of North American birds" (en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121 (15): e2307525121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2307525121. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 38557189. PMC 11009622. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=11009622. 
  46. ↑ IPCC SRCCL Ch2 2019, s. 133.
  47. ↑ Deng, Yuanhong; Li, Xiaoyan; Shi, Fangzhong; Hu, Xia (December 2021). "Woody plant encroachment enhanced global vegetation greening and ecosystem water-use efficiency" (en). Global Ecology and Biogeography 30 (12): 2337–2353. doi:10.1111/geb.13386. ISSN 1466-822X. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13386. Qaraldi: 10 June 2024. Foydalanuvchi Anjaniy/qumloq]]
  48. ↑ IPCC SRCCL Summary for Policymakers 2019, s. 7; Zeng & Yoon 2009.
  49. ↑ Turner et al. 2020, s. 1.
  50. ↑ Urban 2015.
  51. ↑ Poloczanska et al. 2013; Lenoir et al. 2020
  52. ↑ Smale et al. 2019
  53. ↑ IPCC SROCC Summary for Policymakers 2019, s. 13.
  54. ↑ IPCC SROCC Ch5 2019, s. 510
  55. ↑ IPCC SROCC Ch5 2019, s. 451.
  56. ↑ Azevedo-Schmidt, Lauren; Meineke, Emily K.; Currano, Ellen D. (18 October 2022). "Insect herbivory within modern forests is greater than fossil localities" (en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119 (42): e2202852119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2202852119. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 36215482. PMC 9586316. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=9586316. 
  57. ↑ „Coral Reef Risk Outlook“. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2012-yil 2-yanvar). — „At present, local human activities, coupled with past thermal stress, threaten an estimated 75 percent of the world's reefs. By 2030, estimates predict more than 90% of the world's reefs will be threatened by local human activities, warming, and acidification, with nearly 60% facing high, very high, or critical threat levels.“. Qaraldi: 2020-yil 4-aprel.
  58. ↑ Carbon Brief, 7 January 2020.
  59. ↑ Manba xatosi: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Turetsky 2019
  60. ↑ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch28 2014, s. 1596
  61. ↑ „What a changing climate means for Rocky Mountain National Park“. National Park Service. Qaraldi: 2020-yil 9-aprel.
  62. ↑ IPCC AR6 WG1 Summary for Policymakers 2021, s. SPM-23, Fig. SPM.6
  63. ↑ Lenton, Timothy M.; Xu, Chi; Abrams, Jesse F.; Ghadiali, Ashish; Loriani, Sina; Sakschewski, Boris; Zimm, Caroline; Ebi, Kristie L. et al. (2023). "Quantifying the human cost of global warming". Nature Sustainability 6 (10): 1237–1247. doi:10.1038/s41893-023-01132-6. 
  64. ↑ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch18 2014, ss. 983, 1008
  65. ↑ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch19 2014, s. 1077.
  66. ↑ IPCC AR5 SYR Summary for Policymakers 2014, s. 8, SPM 2
  67. ↑ IPCC AR5 SYR Summary for Policymakers 2014, s. 13, SPM 2.3
  68. ↑ Manba xatosi: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named WHO_Nov_2023
  69. ↑ 69,0 69,1 Romanello 2023
  70. ↑ 70,0 70,1 70,2 Ebi et al. 2018
  71. ↑ 71,0 71,1 71,2 Romanello 2022
  72. ↑ 72,0 72,1 72,2 72,3 72,4 IPCC AR6 WG2 SPM 2022, s. 9
  73. ↑ World Economic Forum 2024, s. 4
  74. ↑ 74,0 74,1 Carbon Brief, 19 June 2017
  75. ↑ Mora et al. 2017
  76. ↑ IPCC AR6 WG2 Ch6 2022, s. 988
  77. ↑ World Economic Forum 2024, s. 24
  78. ↑ IPCC AR6 WG2 Ch5 2022, s. 748
  79. ↑ IPCC AR6 WG2 Technical Summary 2022, s. 63
  80. ↑ DeFries et al. 2019, s. 3; Krogstrup & Oman 2019, s. 10.
  81. ↑ 81,0 81,1 Women's leadership and gender equality in climate action and disaster risk reduction in Africa − A call for action. Accra: FAO & The African Risk Capacity (ARC) Group, 2021. DOI:10.4060/cb7431en. ISBN 978-92-5-135234-2. 
  82. ↑ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch13 2014, ss. 796–797
  83. ↑ IPCC AR6 WG2 2022, s. 725
  84. ↑ Hallegatte et al. 2016, s. 12.
  85. ↑ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch13 2014, s. 796.
  86. ↑ Grabe, Grose and Dutt, 2014; FAO, 2011; FAO, 2021a; Fisher and Carr, 2015; IPCC, 2014; Resurrección et al., 2019; UNDRR, 2019; Yeboah et al., 2019.
  87. ↑ „Climate Change | United Nations For Indigenous Peoples“. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Qaraldi: 2022-yil 29-aprel.
  88. ↑ Mach et al. 2019.
  89. ↑ 89,0 89,1 The status of women in agrifood systems - Overview (EN). Rome: FAO, 2023. DOI:10.4060/cc5060en. 
  90. ↑ IPCC SROCC Ch4 2019, s. 328.
  91. ↑ UNHCR 2011, s. 3.
  92. ↑ Matthews 2018, s. 399.
  93. ↑ Balsari, Dresser & Leaning 2020
  94. ↑ Cattaneo et al. 2019; IPCC AR6 WG2 2022, ss. 15, 53
  95. ↑ Flavell 2014, s. 38; Kaczan & Orgill-Meyer 2020
  96. ↑ Serdeczny et al. 2016.
  97. ↑ IPCC SRCCL Ch5 2019, ss. 439, 464.
  98. ↑ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. „What is nuisance flooding?“. Qaraldi: 2020-yil 8-aprel.
  99. ↑ Kabir et al. 2016.
  100. ↑ Van Oldenborgh et al. 2019.
  101. ↑ IPCC AR5 SYR Glossary 2014, s. 125.
  102. ↑ IPCC SR15 Summary for Policymakers 2018, s. 12
  103. ↑ IPCC SR15 Summary for Policymakers 2018, s. 15
  104. ↑ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, s. XX
  105. ↑ United Nations Environment Programme 2024, ss. 33, 34.
  106. ↑ IPCC AR6 WG3 Ch3 2022, s. 300
  107. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, s. 109.
  108. ↑ Teske, ed. 2019, s. xxiii.
  109. ↑ World Resources Institute, 8 August 2019
  110. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch3 2018, s. 266
  111. ↑ Bui et al. 2018, s. 1068; IPCC SR15 Summary for Policymakers 2018, s. 17
  112. ↑ IPCC SR15 2018, s. 34; IPCC SR15 Summary for Policymakers 2018, s. 17
  113. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch4 2018, ss. 347–352
  114. ↑ Friedlingstein et al. 2019
  115. ↑ 115,0 115,1 United Nations Environment Programme 2019, s. 46; Vox, 20 September 2019; Sepulveda, Nestor A.; Jenkins, Jesse D.; De Sisternes, Fernando J.; Lester, Richard K. (2018). "The Role of Firm Low-Carbon Electricity Resources in Deep Decarbonization of Power Generation". Joule 2 (11): 2403–2420. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.006. 
  116. ↑ IEA World Energy Outlook 2023, ss. 18
  117. ↑ REN21 2020, s. 32, Fig.1.
  118. ↑ IEA World Energy Outlook 2023, ss. 18, 26
  119. ↑ „Record Growth in Renewables, but Progress Needs to be Equitable“. IRENA (2024-yil 27-mart).
  120. ↑ IEA 2021, s. 57, Fig 2.5; Teske et al. 2019, s. 180, Table 8.1
  121. ↑ Our World in Data-Why did renewables become so cheap so fast?; IEA – Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2020
  122. ↑ „IPCC Working Group III report: Mitigation of Climate Change“. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022-yil 4-aprel). Qaraldi: 2024-yil 19-yanvar.
  123. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, s. 131, Figure 2.15
  124. ↑ Teske 2019, ss. 409–410.
  125. ↑ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, s. XXIII, Table ES.3; Teske, ed. 2019, s. xxvii, Fig.5.
  126. ↑ 126,0 126,1 IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, ss. 142–144; United Nations Environment Programme 2019, Table ES.3 & p. 49
  127. ↑ „Transport emissions“. Climate action. European Commission (2016). 2021-yil 10-oktyabrda asl nusxadan arxivlangan. Qaraldi: 2022-yil 2-yanvar.
  128. ↑ IPCC AR5 WG3 Ch9 2014, s. 697; NREL 2017, ss. vi, 12
  129. ↑ Berrill et al. 2016.
  130. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch4 2018, ss. 324–325.
  131. ↑ Gill, Matthew; Livens, Francis; Peakman, Aiden. "Nuclear Fission". In Letcher (2020), pp. 147–149. Harvc error: no target: CITEREFLetcher2020 (help)
  132. ↑ Horvath, Akos; Rachlew, Elisabeth (January 2016). "Nuclear power in the 21st century: Challenges and possibilities". Ambio 45 (Suppl 1): S38–49. doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0732-y. ISSN 1654-7209. PMID 26667059. PMC 4678124. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4678124. 
  133. ↑ „Hydropower“. iea.org. International Energy Agency. — „Hydropower generation is estimated to have increased by over 2% in 2019 owing to continued recovery from drought in Latin America as well as strong capacity expansion and good water availability in China (...) capacity expansion has been losing speed. This downward trend is expected to continue, due mainly to less large-project development in China and Brazil, where concerns over social and environmental impacts have restricted projects.“. Qaraldi: 2020-yil 12-oktyabr.
  134. ↑ Watts et al. 2019, s. 1854; WHO 2018, s. 27
  135. ↑ Watts et al. 2019, s. 1837; WHO 2016
  136. ↑ WHO 2018, s. 27; Vandyck et al. 2018; IPCC SR15 2018, s. 97
  137. ↑ IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, s. 300
  138. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, s. 97
  139. ↑ IPCC AR5 SYR Summary for Policymakers 2014, s. 29; IEA 2020b
  140. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, s. 155, Fig. 2.27
  141. ↑ IEA 2020b
  142. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, s. 142
  143. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, ss. 138–140
  144. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, ss. 141–142
  145. ↑ IPCC AR5 WG3 Ch9 2014, ss. 686–694.
  146. ↑ World Resources Institute, December 2019, s. 1
  147. ↑ World Resources Institute, December 2019, ss. 1, 3
  148. ↑ IPCC SRCCL 2019, s. 22, B.6.2
  149. ↑ IPCC SRCCL Ch5 2019, ss. 487, 488, FIGURE 5.12 Humans on a vegan exclusive diet would save about 7.9 GtAndoza:CO2 equivalent per year by 2050 IPCC AR6 WG1 Technical Summary 2021, s. 51 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use used an average of 12 GtAndoza:CO2 per year between 2007 and 2016 (23% of total anthropogenic emissions).
  150. ↑ IPCC SRCCL Ch5 2019, ss. 82, 162, FIGURE 1.1
  151. ↑ „Low and zero emissions in the steel and cement industries“ 11, 19–22.
  152. ↑ 152,0 152,1 152,2 Lebling, Katie; Gangotra, Ankita; Hausker, Karl; Byrum, Zachary „7 Things to Know About Carbon Capture, Utilization and Sequestration“ (en). World Resources Institute (2023-yil 13-noyabr). Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  153. ↑ IPCC AR6 WG3 Summary for Policymakers 2022, s. 38
  154. ↑ World Resources Institute, 8 August 2019: IPCC SRCCL Ch2 2019, ss. 189–193.
  155. ↑ Kreidenweis et al. 2016
  156. ↑ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019, ss. 95–102
  157. ↑ Manba xatosi: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Duchelle-2022
  158. ↑ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019, ss. 45–54
  159. ↑ Nelson, J. D. J.; Schoenau, J. J.; Malhi, S. S. (1 October 2008). "Soil organic carbon changes and distribution in cultivated and restored grassland soils in Saskatchewan" (en). Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 82 (2): 137–148. doi:10.1007/s10705-008-9175-1. ISSN 1573-0867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9175-1. 
  160. ↑ Ruseva et al. 2020
  161. ↑ IPCC AR5 SYR 2014, s. 125; Bednar, Obersteiner & Wagner 2019.
  162. ↑ IPCC SR15 2018, s. 34
  163. ↑ IPCC, 2022: Summary for Policymakers [H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem (eds.)]. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp. 3–33, Template loop detected: Andoza:Doi
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by handAnjaniy/qumloq]].
  164. ↑ IPCC AR5 SYR 2014, s. 17.
  165. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch4 2018, ss. 396–397.
  166. ↑ IPCC AR4 WG2 Ch19 2007, s. 796.
  167. ↑ UNEP 2018, ss. xii–xiii.
  168. ↑ Stephens, Scott A.; Bell, Robert G.; Lawrence, Judy (2018). "Developing signals to trigger adaptation to sea-level rise". Environmental Research Letters 13 (10): 104004. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aadf96. ISSN 1748-9326. 
  169. ↑ Matthews 2018, s. 402.
  170. ↑ IPCC SRCCL Ch5 2019, s. 439.
  171. ↑ Surminski, Swenja; Bouwer, Laurens M.; Linnerooth-Bayer, Joanne (2016). "How insurance can support climate resilience". Nature Climate Change 6 (4): 333–334. doi:10.1038/nclimate2979. ISSN 1758-6798. https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2979. 
  172. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch4 2018, ss. 336–337.
  173. ↑ „Mangroves against the storm“ (en). Shorthand. Qaraldi: 2023-yil 20-yanvar.
  174. ↑ „How marsh grass could help protect us from climate change“ (en). World Economic Forum (2021-yil 24-oktyabr). Qaraldi: 2023-yil 20-yanvar.
  175. ↑ Morecroft, Michael D.; Duffield, Simon; Harley, Mike; Pearce-Higgins, James W. et al. (2019). "Measuring the success of climate change adaptation and mitigation in terrestrial ecosystems". Science 366 (6471): eaaw9256. doi:10.1126/science.aaw9256. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 31831643. 
  176. ↑ Berry, Pam M.; Brown, Sally; Chen, Minpeng; Kontogianni, Areti et al. (2015). "Cross-sectoral interactions of adaptation and mitigation measures". Climate Change 128 (3): 381–393. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1214-0. ISSN 1573-1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1214-0. 
  177. ↑ IPCC AR5 SYR 2014, s. 54.
  178. ↑ Sharifi, Ayyoob (2020). "Trade-offs and conflicts between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review". Journal of Cleaner Production 276: 122813. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122813. ISSN 0959-6526. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620328584. 
  179. ↑ IPCC AR5 SYR Summary for Policymakers 2014, s. 17, Section 3
  180. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch5 2018, s. 447; United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  181. ↑ IPCC SR15 Ch5 2018, s. 477.
  182. ↑ Rauner et al. 2020
  183. ↑ Mercure et al. 2018
  184. ↑ World Bank, June 2019, s. 12, Box 1
  185. ↑ Union of Concerned Scientists, 8 January 2017; Hagmann, Ho & Loewenstein 2019.
  186. ↑ Watts et al. 2019, s. 1866
  187. ↑ UN Human Development Report 2020, s. 10
  188. ↑ International Institute for Sustainable Development 2019, s. iv
  189. ↑ ICCT 2019, s. iv; Natural Resources Defense Council, 29 September 2017
  190. ↑ National Conference of State Legislators, 17 April 2020; European Parliament, February 2020
  191. ↑ Carbon Brief, 16 October 2021
  192. ↑ Khalfan, Ashfaq; Lewis, Astrid Nilsson; Aguilar, Carlos; Persson, Jacqueline; Lawson, Max; Dab, Nafkote; Jayoussi, Safa; Acharya, Sunil (November 2023). Climate Equality: A planet for the 99%. Oxfam GB. doi:10.21201/2023.000001. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621551/cr-climate-equality-201123-en-summ.pdf. Qaraldi: 18 December 2023. Foydalanuvchi Anjaniy/qumloq]]
  193. ↑ Grasso, Marco; Heede, Richard (19 May 2023). "Time to pay the piper: Fossil fuel companies' reparations for climate damages". One Earth 6 (5): 459–463. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.04.012. 
  194. ↑ Carbon Brief, 4 Jan 2017.
  195. ↑ 195,0 195,1 Friedlingstein et al. 2019, Table 7.
  196. ↑ UNFCCC, "What is the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change?"
  197. ↑ UNFCCC 1992, Article 2.
  198. ↑ IPCC AR4 WG3 Ch1 2007, s. 97.
  199. ↑ EPA 2019.
  200. ↑ UNFCCC, "What are United Nations Climate Change Conferences?"
  201. ↑ Kyoto Protocol 1997; Liverman 2009, s. 290.
  202. ↑ Dessai 2001, s. 4; Grubb 2003.
  203. ↑ Liverman 2009, s. 290.
  204. ↑ Müller 2010; The New York Times, 25 May 2015; UNFCCC: Copenhagen 2009; EUobserver, 20 December 2009.
  205. ↑ UNFCCC: Copenhagen 2009.
  206. ↑ "Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change". Copenhagen. 7–18 December 2009. un document= FCCC/CP/2009/L.7. http://unfccc.int/meetings/cop_15/items/5257.php. 
  207. ↑ Bennett, Paige. „High-Income Nations Are on Track Now to Meet 51700 Billion Climate Pledges, but They're Late“. Ecowatch (2023-yil 2-may). Qaraldi: 2023-yil 10-may.
  208. ↑ Paris Agreement 2015.
  209. ↑ Climate Focus 2015, s. 3; Carbon Brief, 8 October 2018.
  210. ↑ Climate Focus 2015, s. 5.
  211. ↑ „Status of Treaties, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change“. United Nations Treaty Collection. Qaraldi: 2021-yil 13-oktyabr.; Salon, 25 September 2019.
  212. ↑ Velders et al. 2007; Young et al. 2021
  213. ↑ WMO SAOD Executive Summary 2022, ss. 20, 31
  214. ↑ WMO SAOD Executive Summary 2022, ss. 20, 35; Young et al. 2021
  215. ↑ Goyal et al. 2019; Velders et al. 2007
  216. ↑ Carbon Brief, 21 November 2017
  217. ↑ WMO SAOD Executive Summary 2022, s. 15; Velders et al. 2022
  218. ↑ „Annual Andoza:CO2 emissions by world region“ (chart). ourworldindata.org. Our World in Data. Qaraldi: 2024-yil 18-sentyabr.
  219. ↑ BBC, 1 May 2019; Vice, 2 May 2019.
  220. ↑ The Verge, 27 December 2019.
  221. ↑ The Guardian, 28 November 2019
  222. ↑ Politico, 11 December 2019.
  223. ↑ „European Green Deal: Commission proposes transformation of EU economy and society to meet climate ambitions“. European Commission (2021-yil 14-iyul).
  224. ↑ The Guardian, 28 October 2020
  225. ↑ „India“. Climate Action Tracker (2021-yil 15-sentyabr). Qaraldi: 2021-yil 3-oktyabr.
  226. ↑ Do, Thang Nam; Burke, Paul J. (2023). "Phasing out coal power in a developing country context: Insights from Vietnam". Energy Policy 176 (May 2023 113512): 113512. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113512. 
  227. ↑ UN NDC Synthesis Report 2021, ss. 4–5; UNFCCC Press Office.. „Greater Climate Ambition Urged as Initial NDC Synthesis Report Is Published“ (2021-yil 26-fevral). Qaraldi: 2021-yil 21-aprel.
  228. ↑ Stover 2014.
  229. ↑ Dunlap & McCright 2011, ss. 144, 155; Björnberg et al. 2017
  230. ↑ Oreskes & Conway 2010; Björnberg et al. 2017
  231. ↑ O'Neill & Boykoff 2010; Björnberg et al. 2017
  232. ↑ 232,0 232,1 Björnberg et al. 2017
  233. ↑ Dunlap & McCright 2015, s. 308.
  234. ↑ Dunlap & McCright 2011, s. 146.
  235. ↑ Harvey et al. 2018
  236. ↑ „Public perceptions on climate change“. PERITIA Trust EU – The Policy Institute of King's College London (2022-yil iyun). 2022-yil 15-iyulda asl nusxadan arxivlangan.
  237. ↑ Powell, James (20 November 2019). "Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 37 (4): 183–184. doi:10.1177/0270467619886266. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0270467619886266?journalCode=bsta. 
  238. ↑ Manba xatosi: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Lynas_2021
  239. ↑ Myers, Krista F.; Doran, Peter T.; Cook, John; Kotcher, John E.; Myers, Teresa A. (20 October 2021). "Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later". Environmental Research Letters 16 (10): 104030. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2774. 
  240. ↑ 240,0 240,1 Weart "The Public and Climate Change (since 1980)"
  241. ↑ Newell 2006, s. 80; Yale Climate Connections, 2 November 2010
  242. ↑ Pew 2015, s. 10.
  243. ↑ Preston, Caroline; Hechinger „In Some Textbooks, Climate Change Content Is Few and Far Between“. undark.org/ (2023-yil 1-oktyabr).
  244. ↑ Pew 2020.
  245. ↑ Pew 2015, s. 15.
  246. ↑ Yale 2021, s. 7.
  247. ↑ Pew 2020; UNDP 2024, ss. 22–26
  248. ↑ Yale 2021, s. 9; UNDP 2021, s. 15.
  249. ↑ Smith & Leiserowitz 2013, s. 943.
  250. ↑ Gunningham 2018.
  251. ↑ The Guardian, 19 March 2019; Boulianne, Lalancette & Ilkiw 2020.
  252. ↑ Deutsche Welle, 22 June 2019.
  253. ↑ Connolly, Kate. „'Historic' German ruling says climate goals not tough enough“. The Guardian (2021-yil 29-aprel). Qaraldi: 2021-yil 1-may.
  254. ↑ Setzer & Byrnes 2019.
  255. ↑ „Coal Consumption Affecting Climate“. Rodney and Otamatea Times, Waitemata and Kaipara Gazette (1912-yil 14-avgust), s. 7. Text was earlier published in Popular Mechanics, March 1912, p. 341.
  256. ↑ Nord, D. C.. Nordic Perspectives on the Responsible Development of the Arctic: Pathways to Action, Springer Polar Sciences. Springer International Publishing, 2020 — 51-bet. ISBN 978-3-030-52324-4. Qaraldi: 2023-yil 11-mart. 
  257. ↑ Mukherjee, A.; Scanlon, B. R.; Aureli, A.; Langan, S.; Guo, H.. Global Groundwater: Source, Scarcity, Sustainability, Security, and Solutions. Elsevier Science, 2020 — 331-bet. ISBN 978-0-12-818173-7. Qaraldi: 2023-yil 11-mart. 
  258. ↑ von Humboldt, A.; Wulf, A.. Selected Writings of Alexander von Humboldt: Edited and Introduced by Andrea Wulf, Everyman's Library Classics Series. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 2018 — 10-bet. ISBN 978-1-101-90807-5. Qaraldi: 2023-yil 11-mart. 
  259. ↑ Erdkamp, Paul; Manning, Joseph G.; Verboven, Koenraad. Climate Change and Ancient Societies in Europe and the Near East: Diversity in Collapse and Resilience, Palgrave Studies in Ancient Economies. Springer International Publishing, 2021 — 6-bet. ISBN 978-3-030-81103-7. Qaraldi: 2023-yil 11-mart. 
  260. ↑ Archer & Pierrehumbert 2013, ss. 10–14
  261. ↑ Foote, Eunice (November 1856). "Circumstances affecting the Heat of the Sun's Rays". The American Journal of Science and Arts 22: 382–383. https://books.google.com/books?id=6xhFAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA382. Qaraldi: 31 January 2016. Foydalanuvchi Anjaniy/qumloq]]
  262. ↑ Huddleston 2019
  263. ↑ Tyndall 1861.
  264. ↑ Archer & Pierrehumbert 2013, ss. 39–42; Fleming 2008, Tyndall
  265. ↑ Lapenis 1998.
  266. ↑ 266,0 266,1 266,2 Weart "The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect"; Fleming 2008, Arrhenius
  267. ↑ Callendar 1938; Fleming 2007.
  268. ↑ Cook, John; Oreskes, Naomi; Doran, Peter T.; Anderegg, William R. L. et al. (2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters 11 (4): 048002. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002. 
  269. ↑ 269,0 269,1 Powell, James (20 November 2019). "Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 37 (4): 183–184. doi:10.1177/0270467619886266. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0270467619886266?journalCode=bsta. Qaraldi: 15 November 2020. Foydalanuvchi Anjaniy/qumloq]]
  270. ↑ 270,0 270,1 270,2 Lynas, Mark; Houlton, Benjamin Z; Perry, Simon (2021). "Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters 16 (11): 114005. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966. ISSN 1748-9326. 
  271. ↑ Myers, Krista F.; Doran, Peter T.; Cook, John; Kotcher, John E.; Myers, Teresa A. (20 October 2021). "Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later". Environmental Research Letters 16 (10): 104030. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2774. 
  272. ↑ Weart "Suspicions of a Human-Caused Greenhouse (1956–1969)"
  273. ↑ Manba xatosi: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named history.aip.org2
  274. ↑ Weart 2013, s. 3567.
  275. ↑ Royal Society 2005.
  276. ↑ National Academies 2008, s. 2; Oreskes 2007, s. 68; Gleick, 7 January 2017
  277. ↑ Joint statement of the G8+5 Academies (2009); Gleick, 7 January 2017. 
"https://uz.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foydalanuvchi:Anjaniy/qumloq&oldid=5349761" dan olindi